Re: Differential Options for my 2013
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:17 pm
Thanks for that info Eric, I have read the 3.45 install threads which is why I started thinking about the swap in the first place. I had the 2.93s in my 96 b-body and it ran great for 17 years in Indiana....flat. But when I got back home in WV I wished I woulda pulled the trigger on 3.42s. And, there was a time when I was going back and forth 3.42s/3.73s.
My car will be a daily driver and as far as fuel mileage I'm not getting anywhere near 300 miles to a tank, about 15.3 mpg with the 2.92s. My thought was because I live here in WV and most of my driving is uphill and stop & go seems logical to think that with a bit more gearing I might pick up more fuel mileage. The vehicle wouldn't work as hard to get rolling and get to speed.
For this reason I was thinking about the 3.27s, more gearing but not enough to hurt mileage worse than it is now.
Thinking about your comment concerning going up by .5 or it's not worth it. I think if you are on the upper end (higher numerical)that may be true, i.e. 3.73s to 4.10s, I could see where there isn't much to be gained, diminishing returns. However, on the other end going up .35 would move the operating RPM range up to where the engine will make more power off idle.
I'm probably over thinking this and either gear set would be a good improvement. I hope this conversation keeps going as more guys make the swap.
My car will be a daily driver and as far as fuel mileage I'm not getting anywhere near 300 miles to a tank, about 15.3 mpg with the 2.92s. My thought was because I live here in WV and most of my driving is uphill and stop & go seems logical to think that with a bit more gearing I might pick up more fuel mileage. The vehicle wouldn't work as hard to get rolling and get to speed.
For this reason I was thinking about the 3.27s, more gearing but not enough to hurt mileage worse than it is now.
Thinking about your comment concerning going up by .5 or it's not worth it. I think if you are on the upper end (higher numerical)that may be true, i.e. 3.73s to 4.10s, I could see where there isn't much to be gained, diminishing returns. However, on the other end going up .35 would move the operating RPM range up to where the engine will make more power off idle.
I'm probably over thinking this and either gear set would be a good improvement. I hope this conversation keeps going as more guys make the swap.